- Previous Article
- Next Article
- Table of Contents
Powder Technology, Vol.208, No.1, 237-241, 2011
Investigation of sulphation behavior of two fly ash samples produced from combustion of different fuels in a 165 MWe CFB boiler
Emission of sulphur dioxide (SO2) from combustion of fossil fuel is an important environmental issue. Circulating fluidized bed combustion (CFBC) technology can use limestone sorbent to achieve in situ SO2 emissions control. This paper presents the chemical and physical analysis results of two fly ash samples derived from a 165 MWe CFBC boiler burning two different fuels with addition of limestone, as they pertain to sulphation behavior. One of the samples in this study was produced from combustion of a bituminous coal with high iron content, the other from firing of blended coal and petroleum coke fuel. The physical examination was conducted by scanning electron microscope (SEM) coupled with an energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) system for analysis of the surface structure or morphology of the sample, as well as the calcium and sulphur distribution. Some large particles derived from high-iron-content fuel were covered by dense iron shells; however, in general such a dense rim was found to not significantly impede the overall desulphurization performance in FBC in terms of the limestone utilization. The large particles (similar to 100 mu m in diameter) in both samples typically consisted of a CaSO4 shell and an almost pure CaO core; however, numerous small particles of diameters of 10-20 mu m consisted predominantly of CaO without sulphate shells. In particular, the emphasis of this investigation has been focused on the remaining capacity of the fly ash for reaction with sulphur dioxide and to clarify the effects of iron, both samples have been doped with additional iron content, and their sulphation behavior examined, and while both experienced a small reduction in sulphation capacity, the fly ash with the initial low iron content experienced the lowest reduction of sulphation capacity after doping, which is not supportive of the idea that iron has an important effect on sorbent capacity. Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier By. All rights reserved.