화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.18, No.5, 1676-1682, September, 2012
Optimal operating condition of membrane reactors to enhance isobutene production, selectivity and hydrogen production
E-mail:
In the isobutene synthesis process, coupling reaction and separation improves isobutene production and selectivity, reduces operation cost and lets to produce hydrogen. This study focuses on the steady state optimization of the isobutane dehydrogenation in hydrogen-permselective Pd/Ag based membrane reactors. The membrane reactors have been modeled heterogeneously based on the mass and energy conservation laws at steady state condition. The Genetic algorithm has been considered to optimize the operating condition of membrane reactors. Optimization results of membrane reactors are compared with conventional adiabatic reactors at the same catalyst loading. This optimal configuration has enhanced isobutene mole fraction about 16.4%.
  1. Weiss AH, Refining Petroleum for Chemicals, American Chemical Society, Washington (1970)
  2. Craig RG, Spence DC, Handbook of Petroleum Refining Processes, McGraw-Hill, New York (1986)
  3. Bhasin MM, McCain JH, Vora BV, Imai T, Pujado PR, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 221(1-2), 397 (2001)
  4. Dodd RH, Watson KM, Process Design of Catalytic Reactors Dehydrogenation of Butane, AIChE, New York (1945)
  5. Korhonen ST, Airaksinen SMK, Banares MA, Krause AOI, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 333(1), 30 (2007)
  6. Cortright RD, Levin PE, Dumesic JA, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 37(5), 1717 (1998)
  7. Bakhshi A, Ehsani MR, Moheb A, The 13th Asia Pacific Confederation of Chemical Engineering Congress, Taipei (2010)
  8. Sahebdelfar S, Bijani PM, Saeedizad M, Zangeneh FT, Ganji K, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 395(1-2), 107 (2011)
  9. Lina YM, Leeb GL, Rei MH, Catal. Today., 44, 343 (1988)
  10. Casanave D, Ciavarella P, Fiaty K, Dalmon JA, Chem. Eng. Sci., 54(13-14), 2807 (1999)
  11. Ciavarella P, Casanave D, Moueddeb H, Miachon S, Fiaty K, Dalmon JA, Catal. Today, 67(1-3), 177 (2001)
  12. Liang WQ, Hughes R, Catal. Today, 104(2-4), 238 (2005)
  13. Moghimpour Bijani P, Sahebdelfar S, Kinet. Catal., 49, 599 (2008)
  14. Abdi A, Kiamanesh V, 1st Iranian Petrochemical Conference, Iran (2008)
  15. Graaf GH, Scholtens H, Stamhuis EJ, Beenackers AACM, Chem. Eng. Sci., 45, 773 (1990)
  16. Tallmadge JA, AIChE J., 16, 1092 (1970)
  17. Hara S, Xu WC, Sakaki K, Itoh N, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38(2), 488 (1999)
  18. Lindsay AL, Bromley LA, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 42, 1508 (1950)
  19. Poling BE, Prausnitz JM, O’Connell JP, The Properties of Gases & Liquids, McGraw-Hill, New York (2001)
  20. Cussler EL, Diffusion, Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems, University Press, Cambridge (1984)
  21. Hirschfelder JO, Curtis CF, Bird RB, Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1952)
  22. Wilke CR, Chem. Eng. Prog., 46, 95 (1950)
  23. Dittus FW, Boelter LMK, Heat Transfer in Automobile Radiators of the Tubular Type, Publications in Engineering, Berkeley (1930)
  24. Dwivedi PN, Upadhyay SN, Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev., 16, 157 (1977)
  25. Goldberg DE, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison Wesley, MA (1989)
  26. Buonomo F, Sanfilippo D, Trifiro F, Handbook of Heterogeneous, John Wiley and Sons, Weinheim (1997)
  27. Sanfilippo D, Miracca I, Catal. Today, 111(1-2), 133 (2006)
  28. Operating data sheet of MTBE plant, Bandar Imam Khomeini Petrochemical Complex, Iran.