| 초록 |
Through wet impregnation, we can controlpromoter amount sophisticatedly, but it is not the only way to control it.Through this study, we investigated how the method of introducing a promoter affects the performance of the CO2 conversion catalyst. The conversion of thecatalyst prepared by the wet impregnation method is 42%, and the C5+ yield is21%. The catalyst introduced as mortar has a conversion of 37% and a C5+ yieldof 14%. The catalyst subjected to calcination after the introduction of themortar has a conversion of 41% and a C5+ yield of 20%. The catalyst using only mortar shows a lower conversion rate than the conversion rate of the wet impregnation method. On the other hand, the catalyst with calcination showed the same conversion rate and C5+ yield as the impregnation method. However, after more than 100 hours, the performance rapidly declined. On the other hand, thecatalyst prepared by the wet impregnation method was not. |
