화학공학소재연구정보센터
Macromolecular Research, Vol.24, No.5, 471-477, May, 2016
Acute Biocompatibility of X-ray Visible Bioabsorbable Bone Plate Coated with β-Tricalcium Phosphate and Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)
E-mail:,
To allow X-ray visibility, we coated a bioabsorbable bone plate in clinical use (PLT-1031, Inion, Finland) with a layer made of a composite of beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) (i.e., β-TCP/PLGA plate) and assessed its in vivo acute biocompatibility for 4 months. For this, we fixed an intact Inion plate and β-TCP/PLGA plate on the left and right humeri of a New Zealand White rabbit, respectively. According to the X-ray imaging, the β-TCP/PLGA plate was observable for 2 weeks after the implantation while the intact plate was not visible during the whole tested period. To evaluate the biocompatibility of the plate, we performed a histological analysis with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining on the tissues obtained at scheduled times. After being tested for 4 months, the overall biocompatibility of the β-TCP/PLGA plate was similar to that of the intact Inion plate and there was also no significant difference in bone repair process between the two plates. On the 5 day after the implantation, both plates exhibited a similar state of early reparative tissue reaction, showing tissue necrosis, abscess formation, and neutrophilic infiltration. In the 2 weeks, inflammation and granulation tissue formation around the plate extended to the skeletal muscle and fat tissue. This gradually decreased through the end of the experiment with only a few foreign body giant cells and macrophages remaining in the fibrotic tissue.
  1. Lee JH, Park JH, Arch. Plast. Surg., 40, 330 (2013)
  2. Mukherjee DP, Pietrzak WS, J. Craniofac. Surg., 22, 679 (2011)
  3. Li S, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 48, 342 (1999)
  4. Eppley BL, Sadove AM, Havlik RJ, Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 100, 1 (1997)
  5. Bhatt V, Chhabra P, Dover MS, J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 63, 756 (2005)
  6. Shasteen C, Kwon SM, Park KY, Jung SY, Lee SH, Park CG, Kim MH, Kim S, Son WC, Choi TH, Choy YB, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B, 101, 320 (2013)
  7. Daculsi G, Biomaterials, 19, 1473 (1998)
  8. Wiltfang J, Merten HA, Schlegel KA, Schultze-Mosgau S, Kloss FR, Rupprecht S, Kessler P, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 63, 115 (2002)
  9. Anderson JM, Shive MS, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 28, 5 (1997)
  10. Makadia HK, Siegel SJ, Polym. Rev., 3, 1377 (2011)
  11. Gopferich A, Biomaterials, 17, 103 (1996)
  12. Sung HJ, Meredith C, Johnson C, Galis ZS, Biomaterials, 25, 5735 (2004)
  13. Agrawal CM, Ray RB, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 55, 141 (2001)
  14. Bauer NB, Brinke N, Heiss C, Skorupa AB, Peters F, Schnettler R, Moritz A, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater., 90, 767 (2009)
  15. Arnoldi J, Henry P, Procter P, Robioneck B, Jonsson A, J. Biomater. Sci.-Polym. Ed., 23, 663 (2012)
  16. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Office, International Standard: Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices-Part 1: Evaluation and Testing, I S O, 2003, 10993-1: 1-14.
  17. Choi SY, Hur W, Kim BK, Shasteen C, Kim MH, Choi LM, Lee SH, Park CG, Park M, Min HS, Kim S, Choi TH, Choy YB, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater., 103, 596 (2015)
  18. Fan X, Chen J, Ruan J, Zhou Z, Zou J, Polym. -Plast. Technol. Eng., 48, 658 (2009)
  19. Tanimoto Y, Hawakawa T, Nemoto K, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater., 73, 157 (2005)
  20. Paragkumar NT, Dellacherie E, Six JL, Appl. Surf. Sci., 253(5), 2758 (2006)
  21. Ma Y, Zheng Y, Liu K, Tian G, Tian Y, Xu L, Yan F, Huang L, Mei L, Nanoscale Res. Lett., 5, 1161 (2010)
  22. Liu D, Zhuang J, Shuai C, Peng S, Biofabrication, 5, 1 (2013)
  23. Daculsi G, Biomaterials, 19, 1473 (1998)
  24. Oonishi H, Hench LL, Wilson J, Sugihara F, Tsuji E, Kushitani S, Iwaki H, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 44, 31 (1999)