Korean Journal of Materials Research, Vol.26, No.11, 604-610, November, 2016
태양광 물 분해를 통한 수소 생산용 Cu2O/CuO 이종접합 광전극의 제작 및 광전기화학적 특성
Fabrication and Photoelectrochemical Properties of a Cu2O/CuO Heterojunction Photoelectrode for Hydrogen Production from Solar Water Splitting
E-mail:
We report on the fabrication and characterization of a novel Cu2O/CuO heterojunction structure with CuO nanorods embedded in Cu2O thin film as an efficient photocathode for photoelectrochemical (PEC) solar water splitting. A CuO nanorod array was first prepared on an indium-tin-oxide-coated glass substrate via a seed-mediated hydrothermal synthesis method; then, a Cu2O thin film was electrodeposited onto the CuO nanorod array to form an oxide semiconductor heterostructure. The crystalline phases and morphologies of the heterojunction materials were examined using X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy, as well as Raman scattering. The PEC properties of the fabricated Cu2O/CuO heterojunction photocathode were evaluated by photocurrent conversion efficiency measurements under white light illumination. From the observed PEC current density versus voltage (J-V) behavior, the Cu2O/CuO photocathode was found to exhibit negligible dark current and high photocurrent density, e.g. -1.05 mA/cm2 at -0.6 V vs. Hg/HgCl2 in 1 mM Na2SO4 electrolyte, revealing the effective operation of the oxide heterostructure. The photocurrent conversion efficiency of the Cu2O/CuO photocathode was estimated to be 1.27% at -0.6 V vs. Hg/HgCl2. Moreover, the PEC current density versus time (J-T) profile measured at -0.5 V vs. Hg/HgCl2 on the Cu2O/CuO photocathode indicated a 3-fold increase in the photocurrent density compared to that of a simple Cu2O thin film photocathode. The improved PEC performance was attributed to a certain synergistic effect of the bilayer heterostructure on the light absorption and electron-hole recombination processes.
Keywords:oxide heterostructure;copper oxide;photoelectrochemical water splitting;hydrogen production
- Winter CJ, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 34(14), S1 (2009)
- Rajeshwar K, J. Appl. Electrochem., 37(7), 765 (2007)
- Moniz SJA, Shevlin SA, Martin DJ, Guo ZX, Tang J, Energy Environ. Sci., 8, 731 (2015)
- Fujishima A, Honda K, Nature, 238, 37 (1972)
- Gratzel M, Nature, 414, 338 (2001)
- Paracchino A, Laporte V, Sivula K, Gratzel M, Thimsen E, Nat. Mater., 10(6), 456 (2011)
- Ho-Kimura SM, Moniz SJA, Tang J, Parkin IP, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 3, 710 (2015)
- Zhang Z, Wang P, J. Mater. Chem., 22, 2456 (2012)
- Moniz SJA, Shevin SA, Martin DJ, Guo ZX, Tang J, Energy Environ. Sci., 8, 731 (2015)
- Wang D, Zhang XT, Sun PP, Lu S, Wang LL, Wang CH, Liu YC, Electrochim. Acta, 130, 290 (2014)
- Park SJ, Kim H, Kim D, Korean J. Mater. Res., 24(1), 19 (2014)
- Kang Z, Yan X, Wang Y, Bai Z, Liu Y, Zhnag Z, Lin P, Zhang X, Yuan H, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Sci. Rep., 5, 7882 (2015)
- de Jongh PE, Vanmaekelbergh D, Kelly JJ, Chem. Mater., 11, 3512 (1999)
- Paracchino A, Brauer JC, Moser JE, Thimsen E, Graetzel M, J. Phys. Chem. C, 116, 7341 (2012)
- Yu PY, Shen YR, Petroff Y, Solid State Commun., 12, 973 (1973)
- Yu PY, Shen YR, Phys. Rev. B, 12, 1377 (1975)
- Goldstein HF, Kim DS, Yu PY, Bourne LC, Chaminade JP, Nganga L, Phys. Rev. B, 41, 7192 (1990)
- Chen Z, Dinh HN, Miller E, Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting: Standards, Experimental Methods, and Protocols, Springer, New York (2013), p. 10.