화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korea Polymer Journal, Vol.9, No.4, 210-219, August, 2001
Structural Changes of Biodegradable Poly(tetramethylene succinate) on Hydrolysis
E-mail:
Quenched and slow cooled as well as isothermally crystallized poly(tetramethylene succinate) (PTMS) films at two different temperatures were prepared. In the process of hydrolysis of the four specimens, structural changes such as the crystallinity, crystal size distribution, lattice parameter, lamellar thickness, long period and surface morphology were investigated by using wide and small angle X-ray scattering (WAXS and SAXS), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The hydrolytic degradation of quenched film was faster than that of slow cooled and isothermally crystallized films. The film crystallized at 100℃ exhibited extensive micro voids and thus showed faster degradation than that crystallized at 75℃, demonstrating surface morphology is another important factor to govern degradation rate. The crystallinity of the specimen increased by 5~10% and long period decreased after hydrolysis for 20 days. At the initial stage of degradation, the lamellar thickness of quenched film rather increased, while that of slow cooled and isothermally crystallized films decreased. The hydrolytic degradation preferentially occurred in the amorphous region. The hydrolytic degradation in crystal lamellae are mainly at the crystal surfaces.
  1. Narayan R, in Science and Engineering of Composing: Design, Environmental Microbiological and Utilization Aspects, H.A.J. Hoitink and H.M. Keener, Eds., Renaisance Publication, Ohio (1993)
  2. Kumor GS, Kalpagam V, Nandi US, J. Macromol. Sci. Rev. Macromol. Chem., C22(2), 225 (1982)
  3. Singhal JS, Singh H, Ray AR, J. Macromol. Sci. Rev. Macromol. Chem., C28(384), 475 (1988)
  4. Vert M, Angew D, Macromol. Chem., 166, 55 (1998)
  5. Huang SJ, Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, 2nd edn, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 220. (1985)
  6. Juang SJ, in Comprehensive Polymer Science, Pergamon Press, London, pp. 567. (1989)
  7. Kaplan DL, Mayer JM, Ball D, in Biodegradable Polymer and Packaging, Techonmics Publishing, Lancaster-Basel, pp. 1 (1993)
  8. Swift G, Acc. Chem. Res., 26, 105 (1993) 
  9. Lens R, in Advances in Polymer Series, Springer-Vierlanger, pp. 1. (1993)
  10. Albertsson AC, Karlsson S, in Comprehensive Polymer Science, First Supplement, Pergamon Press, London, pp. 285.
  11. Huang JC, Shetty AS, Wang MS, Adv. Polym. Technol., 10, 23 (1990) 
  12. Fischer EW, Sterzel HJ, Wenger G, Kolloid-Z. u. Z. Polymere, 251, 980 (1973) 
  13. Carter BK, Wilkes GL, Shakaby SW, Hoffman AS, Ratner BD, Horbett TA, Polymers as Biomaterials, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 67. (1984)
  14. Fredericks RJ, Melveger AJ, Dolegiewtz LJ, J. Polym. Sci. A: Polym. Chem., 22, 57 (1984)
  15. Chu CC, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 26, 1727 (1981) 
  16. Chu CC, Combell NO, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 16, 417 (1982) 
  17. Browing A, Chu CC, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 20, 613 (1986) 
  18. King E, Cameron RE, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 66(9), 1681 (1997) 
  19. Ginde RM, Gupta RK, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 33, 2411 (1987) 
  20. Tokiwa T, Ando T, Suzuki T, Takeda T, Agric. Biol. Chem., 21, 988 (1980)
  21. Nakamura T, Hitomi S, Watanabe S, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 23, 1115 (1986) 
  22. Miller RA, Brady JM, Cutright DE, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 11, 711 (1977) 
  23. Leeslag JW, Gogolewski S, Pennings AJ, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 29, 2829 (1984)
  24. Yoo ES, Im SS, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 18, 350 (1997)
  25. Yoo ES, Im SS, J. Polym. Sci. B: Polym. Phys., 37(13), 1357 (1999) 
  26. Ihn KJ, Yoo ES, Im SS, Macromolecules, 28(7), 2460 (1995)