화학공학소재연구정보센터
Macromolecular Research, Vol.17, No.2, 110-115, February, 2009
Effects of Filler Characteristics and Processing Conditions on the Electrical, Morphological and Rheological Properties of PE and PP with Conductive Filler Composites
E-mail:
The electrical, morphological and rheological properties of melt and dry mixed composites of polyethylene (PE)/graphite (Gr), polypropylene (PP)/Gr and PP/nickel-coated carbon fiber (NCCF) were investigated as a function of filler type, filler content and processing temperature. The electrical conductivities of dry mixed PP/NCCF composites were increased with decreasing processing temperature. For the melt mixed PP/NCCF composites, the electrical conductivities were higher than those of the melt mixed PE/Gr and PP/Gr composites, which was attributed to the effect of the higher NCCF aspect ratio in allowing the composites to form a more conductive network in the polymer matrix than the graphite does. From the results of morphological studies, the fillers in the dry mixed PP/NCCF composites were more randomly dispersed compared to those in the melt mixed PP/NCCF composites. The increased electrical conductivities of the dry mixed composites were attributed to the more random dispersion of NCCF compared to that of the melt mixed PP/NCCF composites. The complex viscosities of the PP/Gr composites were higher than those of the PP/NCCF composites, which was attributed to the larger diameter of the graphite particles than that of the NCCF. Furthermore, the fiber orientation in the ‘along the flow’ direction during melt mixing was attributed to the decreased complex viscosities of the melt mixed PP/NCCF composites compared those of the melt mixed PP/Gr composites.
  1. Srinivasan S, J. Electrochem. Soc., 136, 41 (1989)
  2. Lee SJ, Mukerjee S, McBreen J, Rho YW, Kho YT, Lee TH, Electrochim. Acta, 43(24), 3693 (1998)
  3. Ralph TR, Platinum Met. Rev., 41, 102 (1997)
  4. Srinivasan S, Fuel Cells from Fundamentals to Applications, Springer, New York, 2006, Chap. 4
  5. Doughty DH, Vyas B, Takamura T, Huff JR, Mater. Res. Soc., 393, 151 (1995)
  6. Wind J, Spah R, Kaiser W, Bohm G, J. Power Sources, 105(2), 256 (2002)
  7. Davies DP, Adcock PL, Turpin M, Rowen SJ, J. Power Sources, 86(1-2), 237 (2000)
  8. Makkus RC, Janssen AHH, de Bruijn FA, Mallant RKAM, J. Power Sources, 86(1-2), 274 (2000)
  9. Hornung R, Kappelt G, J. Power Sources, 72(1), 20 (1998)
  10. Park JM, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 225(2), 384 (2000)
  11. Mutong N, Weiduan W, Guoying H, Compos. Interface, 15, 1 (2008)
  12. Hong SM, Hwang SS, Compos. Interfaces, 13(2-3), 145 (2006)
  13. Park SJ, Seo MK, Lee JR, Compos. Interfaces, 13(2-3), 249 (2006)
  14. Kum CK, Sung YT, Han MS, Kim WN, Lee HS, Lee SJ, Joo J, Macromol. Res., 14(4), 456 (2006)
  15. Sung YT, Han MS, Song KH, Jung JW, Lee HS, Kum CK, Joo J, Kim WN, Polymer, 47(12), 4434 (2006)
  16. Prvalko VP, Sukhorukov DI, Karger-Kocsis J, Polym. Eng. Sci., 39(8), 1525 (1999)
  17. Das T, Banthia AK, Adhikari B, Jeong H, Ha CS, Alam S, Macromol. Res., 14(3), 261 (2006)
  18. Kim BS, Bae SH, Park YH, Kim JH, Macromol. Res., 15(4), 357 (2007)
  19. Park JM, Kim JW, Macromol. Res., 10(1), 24 (2002)
  20. Park M, Kim J, Lim SH, Ko MB, Choe CR, Mironov VS, Korea Polym. J., 8(1), 6 (2000)
  21. Lee S, Lee Y, Lee JW, Macromol. Res., 15(1), 44 (2007)
  22. Kum CK, Sung YT, Kim YS, Lee HG, Kim WN, Lee HS, Yoon HG, Macromol. Res., 15(4), 308 (2007)
  23. Sung YT, Han MS, Song KH, Jung JW, Lee HS, Kum CK, Joo J, Kim WN, Polymer, 47(12), 4434 (2006)
  24. Mighri F, Huneault MA, Champagne MF, Polym. Eng. Sci., 44(9), 1755 (2004)
  25. Choi JM, Kim TJ, Hyun MS, Peck DH, Kim SK, Lee BR, Park JS, Jung DH, Carbon Sci., 6, 181 (2005)
  26. Yu G, Zhang MQ, Zeng HM, Hou YH, Zhang HB, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 73(4), 489 (1999)
  27. Feng JY, Chan CM, Polym. Eng. Sci., 39(7), 1207 (1999)
  28. Yu G, Zhang Q, Zeng HM, Hou YH, Zhang HB, Polym. Eng. Sci., 39(9), 1678 (1999)