화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.16, No.6, 967-972, November, 2010
Removal of hydrogen sulfide from a steam-hydrogasifier product gas by zinc oxide sorbent: Effect of non-steam gas components
E-mail:
Removal of H2S from a steam-hydrogasifier product gas was studied at 636 K and 1 atm using a commercially available zinc oxide sorbent in a packed-bed reactor. A mixture gas containing 22% CH4, 18.7% H2, 8.8% CO and 5.5% CO2 (non-steam components subtotaling to 55%) balanced with steam was used to simulate the steam-hydrogasifier product gas. Sorbent particles of 150-250 μm size were used to eliminate the effect of intraparticle mass transfer limitation. Experiments were conducted to monitor H2S breakthrough of reactor effluent stream for operation parameters such as space velocity and inlet H2S concentration. With space velocity varied from 6000 to 8000 to 12,000 h^(-1) for inlet H2S concentration in the range of 100-800 ppmv, sulfur capture capacity of the sorbent (S(cap)) for 2 ppmv H2S breakthrough did not change notably, indicating that, for each inlet H2S concentration tested, sorbent utilization for sulfur removal was not affected by the space velocity. Meanwhile, for each space velocity tested, S(cap) increased monotonically as the inlet H2S concentration increased from 100 to 500 to 800 ppmv,which is opposite to the result observed for the mixture gas devoid of CH4, H2, CO and CO2. As the overall content of these non-steam components of the simulation gas was halved for each inlet H2S concentration tested at 8000 h^(-1) space velocity, S(cap) for non-steam gas components of 27.5% content corresponded approximately to themedian value of those for the non-steam gas components of 55% and 0% content, suggestive of linear dependency of S(cap) upon the content of the non-steam components for the inlet H2S concentration tested.
  1. Jeon SK, Park CS, Hackett CE, Norbeck JM, Fuel., 86, 2817 (2007)
  2. Norbeck JM, Park CS, Raju ASK, Vo C, Suitability of the steam hydrogasification process to convert biomass materials prevalent in southern California into synthetic transportation fuels, California Energy Commission Consultant Report, University of California, Riverside (2008)
  3. Koningen J, Sjostrom K, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 37(2), 341 (1998)
  4. Duvenhage DJ, Coville NJ, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 298, 211 (2006)
  5. Kim K, Jeon SK, Vo C, Park CS, Norbeck JM, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 46(18), 5848 (2007)
  6. Park NK, Lee DH, Lee JD, Chang WC, Ryu SO, Lee TJ, Fuel., 84, 2158 (2005)
  7. Yang HY, Sothen R, Cahela DR, Tatarchuk BJ, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47(24), 10064 (2008)
  8. Sasaoka E, Taniguchi K, Uddin A, Hirano S, Kasaoka S, Sakata Y, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 35(7), 2389 (1996)
  9. Wakker JP, Gerritsen AW, Moulijin JA, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 32, 139 (1993)
  10. Kim K, Park N, Effect of non-steam components of steam-hydrogasifier product gas upon sulfidation of zinc oxide sorbent, Korean J. Chem. Eng., in press
  11. Novochinskii II, Song CS, Ma XL, Liu XS, Shore L, Lampert J, Farrauto RJ, Energy Fuels, 18(2), 576 (2004)
  12. Kwon KC, Park Y, Gangwal SK, Das K, Sep. Sci. Technol., 38(12-13), 3289 (2003)
  13. Kim MJ, Kim H, Jeong KE, Jeong SY, Park YK, Jeon JK, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 16(4), 539 (2010)
  14. Torres W, Pansare SS, Goodwin JG, Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng., 49(4), 407 (2007)