Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.30, No.1, 131-138, January, 2013
Comparison of cost and treatment efficiency of solar assisted advance oxidation processes for textile dye bath effluent
E-mail:
The study investigated the efficiency and cost effectiveness of solar-assisted photochemical processes in comparison with advance oxidation processes (AOPs) for the textile effluents treatment. Efficiency of UV irradiation alone for one hour in removing color was almost double in comparison to solar radiation alone for effluents of different dye concentrations (E1>E2>E3). For coupled UV/H2O2 process, there was higher color removal efficiency obtained for effluent E3 (85%) as compared to E2 (70%) and E1 (57%), while E1 showed higher COD removal efficiency
(70%) as compared to E2 (50%) and E3 (62%). However, the efficiency of solar/H2O2 for COD removal was comparable to UV/ H2O2, i.e., E2 (57%) and E3 (53%). In the case of UV and solar-assisted photo-Fenton processes, removal efficiency of the UV process was further increased as approached to almost 90% removal for E1; on the other hand, the solar-assisted process efficiency remained the same. The relative efficiencies of AOPs were found to be in the order
of UV assisted photo-Fenton process>UV/H2O2>UV alone. Although, solar-assisted Fenton treatments were relatively low and slow but without any energy consumption in comparison to high energy consumption of UV. Among the UV processes, UV assisted photo-Fenton treatment appeared to have better color removal efficiency with energy requirements of 5 kWh/m3, 8 kWh/m3 and 3 kWh/m3 for E1, E2 and E3, respectively.
Keywords:Advance Oxidation Processes (AOPs);Removal Efficiency;Textile Effluent;Cost Efficiency;COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand)
- Gupta VK, Suhas, J. Environ. Manage., 90(8), 2313 (2009)
- Manu B, Chaudhari S, Bioresour. Technol., 82(3), 225 (2002)
- Park H, Choi W, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-Chem., 159, 241 (2003)
- Lucas SM, Peres AJ, Dyes. Pigm., 74, 622 (2007)
- Yasar A, Nasir A, Aamir AAK, J. Color Technol., 122(4), 201 (2006)
- Rizzo L, Water Res., 45, 4311 (2011)
- Vilar VIP, Pinho LX, Pintor AMA, Boaventura RVR, Sol. Energy., 85, 1927 (2011)
- Ranjit PJD, Palanivelu K, Lee CS, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 25(1), 112 (2008)
- Dantas TLP, Mendonca VP, Jose HJ, Rodrigues AE, Moreira RFPM, Chem. Eng. J., 118(1-2), 77 (2006)
- Menendez A, Lombrana JI, de Luis A, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28(2), 388 (2011)
- Park JY, Lee IH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 26(2), 387 (2011)
- Azbar N, Yonar T, Kestioglu K, Chemosphere., 55, 35 (2004)
- Ahmed S, Rasul MG, Martens WN, Brown R, Hashib MA, Water Air Soil. Pollut., 215, 3 (2011)
- Kim YO, Nam HU, Park YR, Lee JH, Park TJ, Lee TH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 21(4), 801 (2004)
- Lee Y, Bae S, Lee W, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 29(6), 769 (2012)
- Sciacca F, Rengifo-Herrera JA, Wethe J, Pulgarin C, Sol.Energy., 85, 1399 (2011)
- Wadley S, Waite TD, Photo-Fenton Oxidation of Pesticides. Enviro 2002 Convention and Exhibition and IWA 3rd World Water Congress, Melbourne, Australia, 7-12 April, 569 (2002)
- Yasar A, Ahmad N, Khan AAA, Yousaf A, J. Environ. Sci., 19, 1183 (2007)
- Oller I, Malato S, Sanchez-Perez JS, Sci. Total Environ., 409, 4141 (2011)
- Arslan I, Balcioglu IA, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 76(1), 53 (2001)
- Yasar A, Tabinda AB, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 19(5), 1051 (2010)
- APHA/AWWA/WEF (American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Environment Federation), Standards for examination of water and waste water, 21st Ed. United Book Press, Baltimore, MD (2005)
- Eren Z, Acar FN, Eren NH, Color Technol., 126(6), 337 (2010)
- Aleboyed A, Moussa Y, Aleboyed H, Dyes. Pigm., 66, 129 (2005)
- Huang YH, Huang YF, Chang PS, Chen CY, J. Hazard. Mater., 154(1-3), 655 (2008)
- Khan H, Ahmad N, Yasar A, Shahid R, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 19(1), 83 (2010)
- Kusic H, Koprivanac N, Horvat S, Bakija S, Bozic AL, Chem. Eng. J., 155(1-2), 144 (2005)