화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.45, 412-420, January, 2017
DOI10.1016/j.jiec.2016.10.010  Export Citation
Treatment of industrial wastewater contaminated with recalcitrant metal working fluids by the photo-Fenton process as post-treatment for DAF
Mohammad Mehdi Amin1, 2, Mohammad Mehdi Golbini Mofrad2, 3, †, Hamidreza Pourzamani1, 2, Seyed Mohammad Sebaradar1, and Karim Ebrahim1, 2
  • 1Environment Research Center, Research Institute for Primordial Prevention of Non-communicable Disease, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  • 2Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  • 3Student Research Center, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
E-mail:
Post-treatment of the industrial wastewater polluted by metalworking fluids (MWFs) was performed using the photo-Fenton process in following of the chemical addition-dissolved air flotation (CA-DAF) unit. Prior to this study, the CA-DAF was operated as full-scale by trial and error. For the photo-Fenton process as a pilot-scale batch reactor, initial pH value, FeSO4, and H2O2 concentrations were considered to study the effect of different operating conditions on chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) removals. This hybrid approach revealed removal efficiencies of 99.85% and 98.9% for COD and TPH in the optimized photo-Fenton process as pH 3, FeSO4: 100 mg/l, and H2O2: 17.8 g/l. The COD degradation results for the photo-Fenton system indicated that it could be well fit using a pseudo firstorder kinetic model. By the GC.MS analysis of DAF and applied photo-Fenton effluents, a 73% removal rate of mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate was detected. It is likely favorable to increase the biodegradability. The cost analysis of this process for the consumed energy (6 kWh) and chemicals (0.01818 kg FeSO4 and 17.15 kg H2O2) was estimated at approximately 26 $ per 1 m3 of DAF effluent. Generally, these results imply that the CA-DAF unit followed by photo-Fenton is an effective and practical method for treating MWFs wastewater.
Keywords:Industrial wastewater;Metal working fluids (MWFs);Photo-Fenton;DAF
  1. MacAdam J, Ozgencil H, Autin O, Pidou M, Temple C, Parsons S, Jefferson B, Environ. Technol., 33, 2741 (2012)
  2. Hilal N, Busca G, Talens-Alesson F, Atkin BP, Chem. Eng. Process., 43(7), 811 (2004)
  3. Lee CC, Environmental Engineering Dictionary, Government Institutes, 2005.
  4. Vahid A, Mojtaba F, Abbas S, Reza K, Casp. J. Appl. Sci. Res., 2 (2013)
  5. Seo D, Lee H, Hwang H, Park M, Kwak N, Cho I, Cho J, Seo J, Joo W, Park K, Water Sci. Technol., 55, 251 (2007)
  6. Jagadevan S, Jayamurthy M, Dobson P, Thompson IP, Water Res., 46, 2395 (2012)
  7. Muszynski A, Załeska-Radziwiłł M, Łebkowska M, Nowak D, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 52, 483 (2007)
  8. Jagadevan S, Dobson P, Thompson IP, Bioresour. Technol., 102(19), 8783 (2011)
  9. Byers JP, Metalworking Fluids, CRC Press, 2006.
  10. Cheng C, Phipps D, Alkhaddar RM, Water Res., 39, 4051 (2005)
  11. Teli A, Vyrides I, Stuckey DC, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 90(3), 507 (2015)
  12. Benito J, Cambiella A, Lobo A, Gutierrez G, Coca J, Pazos C, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 12, 31 (2010)
  13. Remino C, Attanasio A, Gelfi M, La Vecchia M, Pedrazzani R, Minimum quantity lubrication in turning: tool life tests, Technische Akademie Esslingen International Tribology Colloquium Proceedings 14 III (2004) 1497.
  14. Bensadok K, Belkacem M, Nezzal G, Desalination, 206(1-3), 440 (2007)
  15. Rajagopalan K, Rusk T, Dianovsky M, Tribol. Lubr. Technol., 60, 38 (2004)
  16. Pouran SR, Aziz ARA, Daud WMAW, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 21, 53 (2015)
  17. Estrada-Arriaga EB, Zepeda-Aviles JA, Garcia-Sanchez L, Chem. Eng. J., 285, 508 (2016)
  18. Hansson H, Kaczala F, Marques M, Hogland W, Int. J. Photoenergy, 2012 (2012)
  19. Feng C, Sun H, Li S, Camarillo MK, Stringfellow WT, Liang Y, Water Sci. Technol., 71, 1884 (2015)
  20. Muszynski A, Łebkowska M, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 14, 73 (2005)
  21. Hoseini SM, Salarirad MM, Moghaddam MRA, Desalin. Water Treat., 53, 300 (2015)
  22. Painmanakul P, Chintateerachai T, Lertlapwasin S, Rojvilavan N, Chalermsinsuwan T, Chawaloesphonsiya N, Larpparisudthi OA, Int. J. Environ. Earth Sci., 84, 128 (2013)
  23. Bertanza G, Collivignarelli M, Crotti B, Pedrazzani R, Water Sci. Technol., 61, 227 (2010)
  24. Wang LK, Shammas NK, Selke WA, Aulenbach DB, Flotation Technology, Springer, 2010.
  25. de Sena RF, Tambosi JL, Genena AK, Moreira RDPM, Schroder HF, Jose HJ, Chem. Eng. J., 152(1), 151 (2009)
  26. Rubio J, Souza ML, Smith RW, Miner. Eng., 15(3), 139 (2002)
  27. Dincer AR, Munoz VMS, Coupled Advanced oxidation and biological processes for wastewater treatment (2003).
  28. Bautista P, Mohedano AF, Casas JA, Zazo JA, Rodriguez JJ, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 83(10), 1323 (2008)
  29. Karakaya N, Gunes E, Gunes E, Glob. Nest. J., 10, 31 (2008)
  30. Choi YH, Son SU, Lee SS, Sens. Actuators A-Phys., 111, 8 (2004)
  31. Chindris A, Degradation of refractory organic compounds in aqueous wastes employing a combination of biological and chemical treatments (2011).
  32. Moraes JEF, Quina FH, Nascimento CAO, Silva DN, Chiavone-Filho O, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 1183 (2004)
  33. Galvao SAO, Mota AL, Silva DN, Moraes JEF, Nascimento CA, Chiavone-Filho O, Sci. Total Environ., 367, 42 (2006)
  34. Clesceri LS (Ed.), Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd ed., American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association & Water Environment Federation, Washington, 2012.
  35. Roanoke V, Evaluation of Oils and Grease and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Industrial Laundry Effluents and Detergents, ETS Analytical Services, Inc., 1994 June 25.
  36. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Revision 03, 2001, June 1.
  37. Bolton JR, Bircher KG, Tumas W, Tolman CA, Pure Appl. Chem., 73, 627 (2001)
  38. Pignatello JJ, Oliveros E, MacKay A, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 1 (2006)
  39. Karthikeyan S, Titus A, Gnanamani A, Mandal AB, Sekaran G, Desalination, 281, 438 (2011)
  40. Umar M, Aziz HA, Yusoff MS, Waste Manage., 30, 2113 (2010)
  41. Wang JL, Xu LJ, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 251 (2012)
  42. Bokare AD, Choi W, J. Hazard. Mater., 275, 121 (2014)
  43. Muruganandham M, Swaminathan M, Dyes Pigment., 62, 269 (2004)
  44. Elmolla E, Chaudhuri M, J. Hazard. Mater., 170(2-3), 666 (2009)
  45. Rubio-Clemente A, Chica E, Penuela GA, Water Air Soil Pollut., 226, 1 (2015)
  46. Wei J, Song YH, Tu X, Zhao L, Zhi EQ, Chem. Eng. J., 218, 319 (2013)
  47. Dihora JO, Smets J, Schwantes TA, Sands PD, Delivery particles, Google Patents, 2014.
  48. Andreozzi R, Caprio V, Insola A, Marotta R, Catal. Today, 53(1), 51 (1999)
  49. Papa M, Pedrazzani R, Bertanza G, Water Res., 47, 3679 (2013)